Loading...
Current layer: Translation
Chapter 18 • Verse 7
The Yoga of Liberation by Renunciation
MEANING & CONTEXT
Krishna explains the first kind of improper relinquishment. 'Niyatasya tu sannyāsaḥ karmaṇo nopapadyate'—renunciation of prescribed duties (niyatasya karmaṇaḥ) is not proper (na upapadyate). Prescribed duties (yajña, dāna, tapaḥ) should not be renounced. Then he explains what happens when someone does abandon them: 'mohāt tasya parityāgaḥ tāmasaḥ parikīrtitaḥ'—abandonment (parityāgaḥ) of duty out of delusion (mohāt) is declared to be tamasic (tāmasaḥ). This is the first kind of improper tyaga: abandoning prescribed duties out of ignorance or delusion. It's tamasic because it comes from misunderstanding—thinking you should renounce duty when you should perform it with detachment. This clarifies the distinction: you don't renounce prescribed duties, you perform them without attachment.
Explore Human Experiences
How this ancient wisdom applies to your daily life
Key Takeaway
This verse clarifies a crucial misunderstanding: abandoning prescribed duties is not renunciation—it's delusion. Renunciation of prescribed duties (niyatasya karmaṇaḥ) is not proper (na upapadyate). Abandonment of duty out of delusion (mohāt) is tamasic (tāmasaḥ). This is the first kind of improper tyaga: abandoning what you should perform. True renunciation doesn't mean abandoning duty—it means performing duty without attachment to results. When you abandon prescribed duties thinking it's renunciation, you're actually acting from ignorance. The distinction matters: you don't renounce duty, you perform it with detachment. This prevents the misunderstanding that detachment means withdrawal from responsibility.
Personal Reflection
Have you been abandoning prescribed duties thinking it's renunciation? Have you been confusing detachment with abandonment? What would change if you understood that true renunciation means performing duty without attachment, not abandoning duty?
Shortcuts
←/→ Verses
↑/↓ Layers